The Swordsman Revealed: An Update

In my earlier post “A Victorian Fencing Master: or, can you help me identify this painting?” I sought help on an attribution for this painting:

2013-06-29 11.01.41

A couple of people were kind enough to read the blog and tell me that they thought the subject probably was the fencing master Henry Angelo and were more confident than I was that the sketch of him in the National Portrait Gallery was consistent with the portrait.

But James Mulraine (who is an expert in identifying portraits – see his excellent website here) went one better and pointed me to the fact that C.R. Leslie had exhibited a portrait of Henry Angelo at the Royal Academy in 1843.

There is a lesson (or two) to be learnt here.  One thing I had done was check the Royal Academy Exhibition listings – you can find them online – but my first mistake was to, stupidly, start looking from 1845 because I’d become fixated on that date.  (This sometimes happens in police inquiries where one supposedly “known” fact derails or distracts the investigation.) But James was of course right and there in the RA Exhibition catalogue for 1843 is this entry:

East Room:

No. 179 Portrait of Henry Angelo Esq.         C.R. Leslie, R.A.

Now I had never considered C.R. Leslie as a possible contender for the artist, first because I have barely heard of him and second because the one thing I did know was that he painted literary scenes from Shakespeare. I didn’t have him down therefore as a portrait painter: my second mistake.

Before I turn to the Leslie’s biography I should say that a reference to a RA Exhibition listing wouldn’t be enough to convince me this was the same painting.  But the RA annual exhibition, then as now, was an event.  People commented on it, reviewed it, criticised and gossiped about it and 1843 was no exception.  In “The Art-Union: A Monthly Journal of Fine Arts”,  there is a review of the 1843 RA show which comments on individual exhibits. No 179 gets a not entirely favourable mention:

The Art Journal, Supplementary Number, June 1, 1843, page 165

The Art Journal, Supplementary Number, June 1, 1843, page 165

I probably agree with the criticism that the work is “kept” (as in controlled or in good condition) apart from the head, however I ignored the “too great prevalence of cold tints” because the exciting thing is that the description exactly matches the painting.  The one thing that had always been a problem in linking this painting to other artists – the fact that for a three-quarter length portrait it is quite small at only 60cm tall – turns out to be a helpful identifier.

The identification with Leslie as the artist is also consistent with the T. Brown suppliers mark on the back of the canvas.  Leslie is listed as one of the artists who used Brown’s canvases; his self-portrait in the NPG is one example.  My third mistake.

I’ll come to my fourth mistake in a minute but first a brief mention of the life and career of C.R. Leslie.

C.R. Leslie RA c1850

C.R. Leslie, RA c1850

Charles Robert Leslie was born in London in 1794 to American parents.  From time to time people try to claim him as an American artist and although he spent his childhood in Philadelphia he seems to have considered his home as England.  He arrives in London aged 17 to attend the Royal Academy schools were he wins various prizes.  He is known for cabinet pictures or representations of literary scenes, much like David Wilkie’s.  (As James Mulraine also points out; in a print of Leslie’s painting “Charles Dickens as Captain Bobadil” in the V&A there is a very prominent and detailed sword).

I hadn’t however realised that he also produced a number of formal portraits which he exhibited regularly at the Royal Academy.  He became ARA in 1821 and a full RA in 1826.  He is also quite a distinguished author having published a book on Reynolds (which I have – so that probably counts as mistake no. 5) and in 1843, the year of our painting, his “Memoirs of the Life of John Constable” which is still a valuable source on the artist.  He also publishes (posthumously) his own “Autobiographical Recollections” in 1860.

In 1833 he left England to return to America to become a teacher at the US military academy at West Point.  This may seem surprising that a military academy would have a drawing teacher but anyone who has read about the life of James McNeill Whistler will know he attended the academy where drawing was considered important, albeit because it related to map making and battlefield reports.  There is a further connection between Leslie and Whistler because later, back in London, the young Whistler attended Leslie’s lectures on art at the Royal Academy.  I know this because not long ago I read Daniel E. Sutherland’s book “Whistler: A Life for Art’s Sake” where the lectures, published in The Athenaeum magazine, are mentioned. Had I read all the footnotes to that book I would have spotted that a quote from Leslie  about “the great and unceasing” difficulty facing artists came from a letter he wrote to one Henry Angelo, Esq. on 4th February 1848.  That letter is now in the archive of the Art Institute of Chicago (Box .FF 6.49). So I had on my bookshelf, just yards from the painting, a link between the artist and Henry Angelo.  That was my fourth mistake.

I could mention some other errors: I failed to notice that there are two editions of Henry Angelo Snr’s book of Reminiscences.  The edition I hadn’t looked at has an engraving of Henry Snr (from a portrait by W Childe) which has a striking family resemblance to his son.

Angelo book title page

So, thanks to a very helpful tip-off and the magic that is the internet, I have managed to fill in the key details of the painting that hangs in my hall.  There are still some things I want to do – follow up on correspondence for example – but I feel confident that I can now label this picture:

Henry Angelo Esq, by C.R. Leslie R.A., exhibited 1843

Henry Angelo Esq, by C.R. Leslie R.A., exhibited 1843

Advertisements
This entry was posted in art and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Swordsman Revealed: An Update

  1. Shelley Angelo-Forrest says:

    Hi I entered a comment yesterday which disappeared. I want permission to use a copy of the portrait of Charles Henry Angelo II 1780-1852. I am an NZ Angelo descendant and we are in a direct line with Henry II. I was delighted to find the portrait as our family had no knowledge of it. I am writing a family history for my 6 grandsons. Just for your interest: my cousins started an Angelo Fencing Salon in Dunedin NZ and next year in connection with this the 300th celebration
    of Domenico’s birth will take place in February with an Angelo family gathering including people from overseas. My father looked not unlike
    Henry II. If you send me your email I will send you a photo of him!
    The Nightingale pencil sketch in the National Art Gallery London I think is certainly, as they claim, also Henry II because the clothes and hair style fit the period and he is much younger. My gggrandfather Charles Henry Angelo III 1806-1865 the last to run the Angelo Fencing Salon in London does not appear to have aroused much publicity. We do not have a photo of him.
    The portrait of HENRY II is now in your home? I have copied it from your blog and will be grateful for permission to use it in my family history. How do you want it cited? Kind regards.

    • Thanks for your comment. I had no idea the Angelos has spread so far across the globe. I do have the portrait of Henry II in my house. I like your numbering, it can get confusing between the Henrys. I am of course more than happy for you to use the images of the painting and to cite it in any way you please. Let me know if you want me to send you more high def photos.

  2. Shelley Angelo-Forrest says:

    Thanks and I would be delighted to receive a higher definition photo which I will distribute around the family. A descendant in Australia maintains a family tree covering all lines (including female) from Domenico’s time so we are well documented. Great to have made this contact.

  3. Matt Easton says:

    Hi, fantastic find. I am a fencing teacher and historian. I presume that the importance of the diagram and sword in the painting are appreciated, but just to clarify – Henry II (pictured here) was the Superintendent of Sword Exercise in the British Army from around 1830 until his death in 1852 and wrote the 1817 Infantry Sword Exercise, which was repeatedly re-published until 1874 (when it was replaced by a new simplified system). The most common edition to find now is the 1845 version, which has also been reproduced in facsimile and is also available in scanned form from my original copy, hosted on my website http://www.swordfightlondon.com The diagram in the painting is the arrangement of cuts and guards, while the sword is an example of the 1822 infantry officer’s sword – the appropriate model of sword for the manual. Henry II also wrote the 1813 Cutlass Exercise and the 1819 Cavalry Sword Exercise, both of which were repeatedly re-published. He took over the Angelo Academy of Arms, which after his death was run by his son Henry III and then William McTurk (his former student and assistant). Many famous fencers of the day studied at the Angelo Academy of Arms, including Captain Alfred Hutton.

  4. Liz Angelo says:

    Matt I have just discovered you post. The 300th celebration of Domenico Angelo’s birth will be next weekend 4- 6 Jan 2017 in Dunedin NZ and will include members of Salle Angelo. I will pass on your post which I’m sure they will find interesting. Which country are you in?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s